This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

The Maze: A fat margin can hide a slow business. A thin margin can support a fast one. Costco sits at 13.2 inventory turns in Fabrice Haiat’s retail comparison, ahead of Walmart at 9.2 and Macy’s at 3.1. Inventory turns relate annual merchandise costs to the stock held by a business. They capture capital moving through inventory, not the fate of every item on a shelf. The ranking is source-reported: its fiscal years and averaging basis are unspecified. The useful question is how much stock a retailer needs to support its sales.

  • Costco leads on movement, not just price. The nine-company comparison puts Costco well ahead of Walmart, with Ross Stores at 6.3, Target at 6.1 and T.J. Maxx at 5.7. That spread makes inventory intensity a useful companion to gross margin. A retailer can earn less on each sale yet reuse the money tied up in stock more often. The comparison does not establish which business earns the highest return: operating costs, supplier terms and the amount of inventory each company carries also matter. Speed is one economic input, not a complete league table of management quality.

  • The middle of the ranking is a warning against easy labels. Ross Stores and Target sit close together despite selling through different retail formats. Nordstrom follows at 4.9, Home Depot at 4.4, Macy’s at 3.1 and Signet, the jewellery retailer, at 2.1. Assortment and category mix can help explain why stock moves at different rates. A business carrying durable, infrequently purchased goods faces a different task from a high-volume warehouse. Treat these as prompts to examine stock commitments, not a reason to demand one turnover target across every category.

  • The operating model has to make the speed possible. Costco describes limited selection, low prices and efficient distribution as parts of its volume-and-turnover model. For an operator, the practical questions are familiar: are the right products available, are popular lines replenished, and does recorded stock match the shelf? Keeping extra choice carries a working-capital cost; cutting choice can sacrifice demand. The job is to decide which products deserve that investment. A margin report tells you what a sale earns. Stock ageing helps show what the business is waiting to sell.

  • A small calculation difference deserves a clear label. Costco’s FY2025 filing supports roughly 11% gross margin. Its merchandise costs divided by simple opening/closing average inventory give about 13.05 turns; using ending inventory gives 13.24, close to the displayed 13.2. The post may use another averaging basis, but does not identify it. Preserve the original figures as attributed values, disclose that limit and avoid pretending all nine companies share one verified year and formula. Consolidated accounts may also include international operations; this is not established as US-only data.

Why it matters: Margin percentage measures one part of the retail engine. Inventory movement adds the cost of waiting. Review gross profit, stock ageing and capital tied up together, then ask which assortment and replenishment choices explain the result. A faster turn is useful when it supports demand and cash generation; an empty shelf is simply a missed sale. The opportunity is to make stock productive without confusing a source-reported ranking with a universal operating target. Revenue gets attention. Inventory sends the bill for hesitation.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate